America - United We Stand Divided We Are

two party system in America is not disturbed until the last days for several reasons. First, it is always taken for granted that the singular goal of each party was identical. The goal is to do what is best for the country. The only real difference between the partisans was how to achieve that goal. The American public believes that the goal was singular and pervasive in the minds of most of our statesmen and we trust that it will work on ways and means, and the state would move forward, at the end of the day. Why is this not the case today?

Why are the differences that can be used to stimulate discussion and excite dissimulated reason. Now the differences are likely to create impassible pits, picketing, upheaval, and riots. answers are not out of reach, but they are likely to be sounded much less heard.

Reason number one is that today we have more politicians than ever before, but far fewer statesmen. If you are looking for a George Washington or Abraham Lincoln in our ranks will be disappointed. In fact just looking for you could be ridiculed and labeled as a sentimentalist who is wallowing in nostalgia about trying to discover the glory that was Rome, but on the second day.

The second obvious reason is that the terms Democratic and Republican have been replaced in large part by the terms liberal and conservative respectively. Indications are moved to the connotations in our perception. When we talk about America's perception of just about anything that is where the reality with regard to walking papers. Evidence for this is now widespread in the importance we place on individual opinion, rather than discovering the truth as it applies to us collectively. Fueled by the fall of personal responsibility and growth of individual rights liberalism has its own life, which only emphasizes our responsibility to get our own.

from Hollywood, media, academia, and pop culture, right down the street, the tune we dance everything goes personal freedom that can not be challenged as long as it does not hurt anyone else. Gee, sounds like anarchy eh? Is liberalism anarchy? Tacit, but do not expect a liberal to admit to anything, what would be conservative.

Examples abound everywhere in American culture and attitude. Who would have thought the day would come when they will be less important to fight to flush out his enemies than to fight to flush our unborn children down the toilet. Roe v. Wade battle lasted more than a generation and cost millions of lives, but that is compared to several years in Iraq and several thousand lives? It's hard not to notice, except in the liberal mind the blaring difference between the outcome of Roe v. Wade and the war in Iraq. In Iraq, our young men and women are tough, brave, armed to the teeth and they can at least defend yourself. They lost the Roe v. Wade are weak and innocent, and offer no defense whatever. Again this is more of what makes the definition of incongruity? Perhaps closer to what makes the definition of ridiculous.

To avoid the tyranny of prosecuting those who do not have the right theology or faith in God we decided to let the Congress that there is no law on religion. meaning of the term is also dissimulated to what is commonly referred to as the "separation of church and state." Even if we could live with a little twist to the actual law first introduced in the constitution we can not live with the connotations that have emerged and are now held by the original meaning like rocks in the pockets of drowning. Now certainly one could say that America has expanded the concept of "separation of church and state." Now second separation accepted and coddled more blatantly than perhaps ever could expect only a decade ago.

How about separation of state and morality, the separation of political commitment and character, separating life and death itself, sound harsh? It's just that covered by the separation of hearing and learning or even see to believe. In the end it all leads to the separation of right and wrong. Unfortunately, even the question of right and wrong in America now put up the question of "who cares and who does not ."

In a recent TV commercial theme is a retired person who wants to fly than to play shuffle board or some other tedious activities. The assumption is that America will continue as usual, portfolios and personal security will swell to meet us in the golden years. Being freed people that this generation is we jump into our Piper Cub or a dragon and take to the sky. Oh, do not listen to those gloomy doomsayers who are predicting not so favorable weather, after all they are not "scientists", they are just kooks, self recognized prognosticators or just plain daft. Between the immutable laws of reciprocity and all that's left for good reason in this country it takes no prophet to see that we are more likely to sit down and cry than to stand up and fly.

Liberalism may seem like a way to go, but history, and even the most extravagant connotation of the word justice says otherwise. Sinking morale and rising world hatred of America is just the beginning not only in the Bible prophecy, but also something much more fundamental and wholly irreversible. Simply put, it's probably far more complicated for the liberal mind, do not be deceived: God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Galatians 6:07